tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16959378.post2839483772539136986..comments2023-10-16T04:58:53.689-04:00Comments on Verily Verily: gendered pronouns in a discussion of RomansRafaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14471888340005683193noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16959378.post-80185665478265928442012-02-23T13:14:49.772-05:002012-02-23T13:14:49.772-05:00Nope. Not this fall. Two words: Sab. Batical.Nope. Not this fall. Two words: Sab. Batical.Rafaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14471888340005683193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16959378.post-86202496347994103642012-02-23T13:07:35.904-05:002012-02-23T13:07:35.904-05:00And yes, the (s)he was a joke! :DAnd yes, the (s)he was a joke! :DAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14146567916374525768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16959378.post-42117750729580142282012-02-23T13:06:52.736-05:002012-02-23T13:06:52.736-05:00I just started reading some of Jewett's work t...I just started reading some of Jewett's work this past year (dealing with 1 Thessalonians' closing). Here is my question, does (s)he do this consistently or just in Romans?<br /><br />On another note, looking at my schedule, I may have my first Rodriguez class this fall. Should be a blast!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14146567916374525768noreply@blogger.com